OR RATHER TWO HEURISTIC CONCEPTS HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE AND HUMAN RIGHTS CONSCIOUSNESS

and lastly Sequence and Contrast. The types of relation between N and S do not completely follow stable order, for instance, N may go before S or in contrast S may go before N. However in English Mann and Thompson provide some common types. When N goes first, the r[r]

See generally Michael Byers and Georg Nolte (eds.), United States Hegemony and theFoundations of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003); MichaelIgnatieff (ed.), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (Princeton: Princeton UniversityPress,[r]

EMPLOYMENT LAW led her to enroll in law schoolat Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan,where she was on the Wayne Law Review andclerked for several legal employers, includingthe United Auto Workers (UAW) Union.Working for the UAW, Ettelbrick was exposedto a variety of labor law andPUBLIC POLIC[r]

defined poverty as “a human condition charac-terized by sustained or chronic deprivation ofthe resources, capabilities, choices, security and power necessary for the enjoyment of an adequate standard of living and other civil, cultural, economic, political and soci[r]

asserts that MSN Spaces do not filterblog content in any way. Amnesty International considers this claim to be atodds with the facts.When Microsoft launched MSN Spaces in China in June 2005, attempts tocreate blogs with words including ‘democracy’, ‘human rights’ and ‘freedomof[r]

9Conclusion: In praise of human rightsnihilism[T]he highest values are losing their value. (Nietzsche)I started this book because I found the idea of human rights both attractive andunconvincing, if not positively dangerous. This ambivalence drove me to ask: canwe/should we beli[r]

The urgency and magnitude of the risks and threats to our collective sustainability, alongside increasing choice and opportunities, will make transparency about economic, environmental, and social impacts a fundamental component in eective stakeholder relations, investme[r]

The idea that di=erent types of society produce, or at least coincidewith, di=erent types of law is a foundational element of the law andsociety framework but is at odds with commonly held notions of law’stranscendence. Modern Western views of law as transcendent can betraced back to Plato