sensitive medical information retrieval, The 11th World Congress on Medical Informat-ics (MEDINFO 2004), San Francisco, CA, September 2004, IOS Press, pp. 282–286.Blum P. and Langley, P. Selection Of Relevant Features And Examples In Machine Learning,Artificial Intelligence, 1997;97: 245-271Ca[r]
The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we describe the overall architecture of our sys-tem. Section 3 discusses our improved frequency correlation-based feature, while Section 4 de-scribes in detail the document relationship heu-ristics used in our model. Section 5 rep[r]
and marginal distributions, and their direct usage of the mu-tual information measure (cf. [8, 9, 10]). One of the diffi-culties in applying MI based feature selection methods, isthe fact that evaluating the MI measure involves integrat-ing over a dense set, which leads to a compu[r]
lar” word senses. Learning this prior for featurerelevance of a test word sense makes those fea-tures that have been selected in the models of other“similar” word senses become more likely to beselected.We learn the feature relevance prior only fromdistributionally similar word senses, rather[r]
Việc chọn các tính chất để thể hiện ảnh gọi là trích chọn đặc trưng Feature Selection gắn với việc tách các đặc tính của ảnh dưới dạng các thông tin định lượng hoặc làm cơ sở để phân biệ[r]
models for scenes. Moreover, the correlation of image variations at neighboring pixels is explicitly utilized to achieve robustdetection performance since neighboring pixels tend to be similarly affected by environmental effects (e.g., dynamic scenes).Experimental results demonstrate the robust[r]
Bayesian Methods for Machine LearningZoubin Ghahramani* Tutorial Notes Now Available Here *TopicMany topics in Machine Learning (e.g. kernel methods, clustering, semi-supervised learning, feature selection, active learning, reinforcement learning)can be addressed within the framework o[r]
driven approach. Traditionally, information ex-traction and language understanding fields haveusually used a syntactic parser to encode globalinformation (e.g. parse tree path, governing cat-egory, or head word) over a local model. In a se-mantic role labeling task, the syntax and semanticsare correl[r]
experimental results show that our framework helps us to better understand and compare different FS methods. Furthermore, the novel method WFO generated from the framework, can perform robustly across different domains and feature numbers. In our study, we use four data sets to test our new m[r]
conducted by semiautomated, region centroid-based align-ment. The low magnitudes of these similarity values (ap-proximately in the interval [0.325,0.365]) proved that theintensity-based automatic alignment would not be robustand would very frequently fail. As a consequence, we did nota[r]
The Case StudiesIntroduction to the case studiese following ten case studies represent the rst professors (also called subject matter experts or SMEs), out of a total of forty-four faculty members, to have implemented the instructional design model prototype (hereafter simply called the “model”) a[r]
the GENERALITY of a system in which linguis- tic knowledge of all sorts may be expressed at least as long as we do not sacrifice processing efficiency. This is an overarching goal of HPSG (Pollard and Sag 1987) in which syntax and semantics is described in a feature formalism, and in which st[r]
Hindawi Publishing CorporationEURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems BiologyVolume 2007, Article ID 38473, 12 pagesdoi:10.1155/2007/38473Research ArticleDecorrelation of the True and Estimated Classifier Errors inHigh-Dimensional SettingsBlaise Hanczar,1, 2Jianping Hua,3and Edward R. Dougherty[r]
the proxy, which then unblinds the respective keywords.Finally, the database publishes its non-blinded data forthese keywords. As opposed to these approaches, SEPIAdoes not depend on two central entities but in generalsupports an arbitrary number of distributed privacy peers,is provably secure, and[r]
Hindawi Publishing CorporationEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal ProcessingVolume 2007, Article ID 45821, 15 pagesdoi:10.1155/2007/45821Research ArticleA Review of Signal Subspace Speech Enhancement andIts Application to Noise Robust Speech RecognitionKris Hermus, Patrick Wambacq, and Hugo Van ha[r]
form, it is a good approximation of Word's behavior in a few cases, such as {principal, principle}, where it scores 12% and 94%. In general, Word achieves a high score in either the correct or the corrupted condition, but not both at once. Tribayes compares quite favorably with Word in this experime[r]
nity [1–4]. As is known, radar HRRP is a strong function oftarget aspect, and serious speckle fluctuation may exist whentarget-radar orientation changes, which makes HRRP RATRa challenge task. In addition, target may exist at any posi-tion in real system, thus the position of an observed HRRPin a tim[r]