0.1.11Since 1.11 is a result of transforming 1.1, qualitative properties of 1.11 such as theexistence and uniqueness of solutions, oscillation and nonoscillation, stability and asymptoticbehavior can imply similar qualitative properties of 1.1.The advantage of the suggested method in compa[r]
Let us remind you once again that scaling of the variables is often crucial forsuccessful integration of differential equations. The scaling “trick” suggested inthe discussion following equation (16.2.8) is a good general purpose choice, butnot foolproof. Scaling by the maximum values[r]
y = –2–23Figure 31.9◆EXAMPLE 31.17 An industrial plant produces radioactive material at a constant rate of 4 kilograms per year.The radioactive material decays at a rate proportional to the amount present and has a half-life of 20 years.(a) Write a differential equation whose solution is R(t)[r]
+ g(t).(15.5.4.16)Relations (15.5.4.11), (15.5.4.15) and system (15.5.4.16) determine a generalized separable solution ofequation (15.5.4.10). The first equation in (15.5.4.16) can be solved independently; it is linear if B2= 0 and isintegrable by quadrature for f(t) = const. The second equation in ([r]
RESEARC H Open AccessSome new nonlinear retarded sum-differenceinequalities with applicationsWu-Sheng Wang1*, Zizun Li2and Wing-Sum Cheung3* Correspondence: wang4896@126.com1Department of Mathematics,Hechi University, Guangxi, Yizhou546300, People’s Republic of ChinaFull list of author information i[r]
In the general case, this expression cannot be represented as the sum of two functions depending on differentarguments. This, however, does not mean that equation (15.4.3.1) has no solutions of the form (15.4.1.1).1◦. One can make sure by direct check that the functional differential equation[r]
f(w)g(w)dw + θ(x)g(w), (1)where θ(x) is an arbitrary function. The first integral (1) may be treated as a first-orderordinary differential equation in x.Onfinding its general solution, one should replace theconstant of integration C with an arbitrary function of time ψ(t), since w is dependent[r]
732Chapter 16. Integration of Ordinary Differential EquationsSample page from NUMERICAL RECIPES IN C: THE ART OF SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING (ISBN 0-521-43108-5)Copyright (C) 1988-1992 by Cambridge University Press.Programs Copyright (C) 1988-1992 by Numerical Recipes Software. Permission is grante[r]
functional differential equations w ith a non-dense domain,” Acta Mathematica Sinica (EnglishSeries), vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 933–942, 2004.[19] M. Laklach, “Contribution`al’´etude des´equations aux d´eriv´ees part ielles`aretardetdetypeneutre,” Th`ese de doctorat, l’Universit´e de Pau et d[r]
Longstaff, F. A. and E. S. Schwartz (2001) Valuing American options by simulation: asimple least-squares approach. Review of Financial Studies, 14:113–147.Lowenstein, Roger (2001) When Genius Failed. London: Fourth Estate.Madan, Dilip B. (2001) On the modelling of option prices. Quantitative Finance[r]
stores intermediate results, and generally acts as an interface with the user. There isnothing at all canonical about our driver routines. You should consider them to beexamples, and you can customize them for your particular application.Of the routinesthat follow, rk4, rkck, mmid, stoerm,andsimpr a[r]
4. KẾT LUẬN Từ nguyên lý so sánh ta thấy rằng mọi nghiệm nhớt của bài toán Dirichlet (3.1) phải trùng nhau và từ đó ta thu được tính duy nhất nghiệm của bài toán. Mặt dù khái niệm và các tính chất của nghiệm nhớt đã được nghiên cứu bởi nhiều tác giả, bài báo này khảo sát cho loại phương trình parab[r]
Economic Literature,toappear.Rebonato, Riccardo (1999) Volatility and Correlation: In the Pricing of Equity, FX andInterest-Rate Options. Chichester: Wiley.Ripley, B. D. (1997) Stochastic Simulation. Chichester: Wiley.Rogers, L. C. G. (2002) Monte Carlo valuation of American options. MathematicalFin[r]
Economic Literature,toappear.Rebonato, Riccardo (1999) Volatility and Correlation: In the Pricing of Equity, FX andInterest-Rate Options. Chichester: Wiley.Ripley, B. D. (1997) Stochastic Simulation. Chichester: Wiley.Rogers, L. C. G. (2002) Monte Carlo valuation of American options. MathematicalFin[r]
12 Asymptotic boundary value problems for evolution inclusionsthat T has a fixed point, we need to ensure that T is compact or, at least, condensingwith respect to a suitable measure of noncompactness. Due to the compactness of thefirst inclusion, it is sufficient that NFmaps compact sets on compact (or[r]
.CITED REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING:Gear, C.W. 1971,Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations(EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall). [1]Kaps, P., and Rentrop, P. 1979,Numerische Mathematik, vol. 33, pp. 55–68. [2]Shampine, L.F. 1982,ACM Transactions on Mathema[r]
readable files (including this one) to any servercomputer, is strictly prohibited. To order Numerical Recipes books,diskettes, or CDROMsvisit website http://www.nr.com or call 1-800-872-7423 (North America only),or send email to trade@cup.cam.ac.uk (outside North America).are using is known to be[r]
=cosπJ+∆x∆y2cosπL1+∆x∆y2(19.5.24)Equation (19.5.24) holds for homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann boundary condi-tions. For periodic boundary conditions, make the replacement π → 2π.A second way, which is especially useful if you plan to solve many similarelliptic equations each time with sl[r]
(19.4.26)Thus uis the solution of a zero-gradient problem, with the source term modifiedby the replacement∆2ρ0,l→ ∆2ρ0,l+2∆gl(19.4.27)Sometimes Neumann boundary conditions are handled by using a staggeredgrid, with the u’s defined midway between zone boundaries so that first derivativesare centered on[r]